↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Insulin-Like Growth Factor Axis and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Longitudinal Study in a Multiracial Cohort
Published in
Diabetes, July 2016
DOI 10.2337/db16-0514
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-axis may be implicated in glucose homeostasis, but its longitudinal profile across gestation in relation to the development of gestational diabetes (GDM) is largely unknown. We prospectively investigated IGF-axis biomarkers in early-to-mid pregnancy in relation to subsequent GDM risk in a case-control study of 107 GDM cases and 214 non-GDM controls, with blood samples collection at gestational weeks (GW) 10-14, 15-26, 23-31, and 33-39. Conditional logistic regression was used, adjusting for major risk factors including pre-pregnancy body mass index. Plasma IGF-I and IGF-binding protein (BP)-3 concentrations and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio increased whereas IGFBP-2 decreased throughout pregnancy. At GW 10-14, both IGF-I and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 were positively associated with GDM risk; adjusted odds ratio comparing the highest vs. lowest quartile (ORQ4-Q1) was 2.93 (95% confidence interval 1.18-7.30) for IGF-I and 3.31 (1.10-9.98) for IGF-I/IGFBP-3. In contrast, higher IGFBP-2 levels were related to a substantially lower risk of GDM (ORQ4-Q1 0.04, 0.01-0.06). Similar results were observed at GW 15-26. In sum, the IGF-axis, IGFBP-2 in particular, may be implicated in the pathogenesis of GDM with significant associations and incremental predictive value detected as early as GW 10-14, approximately 10-18 weeks earlier before GDM is typically screened for.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 27%
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,268,952
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes
#7,234
of 9,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,791
of 365,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes
#94
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.