You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global biodiversity monitoring: From data sources to Essential Biodiversity Variables
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.014 |
| Authors |
Vânia Proença, Laura Jane Martin, Henrique Miguel Pereira, Miguel Fernandez, Louise McRae, Jayne Belnap, Monika Böhm, Neil Brummitt, Jaime García-Moreno, Richard D. Gregory, João Pradinho Honrado, Norbert Jürgens, Michael Opige, Dirk S. Schmeller, Patrícia Tiago, Chris A.M. van Swaay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 24% |
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 86% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 831 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 815 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 195 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 133 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 102 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 6% |
| Other | 136 | 16% |
| Unknown | 150 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 269 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 248 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 42 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 2% |
| Engineering | 17 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 5% |
| Unknown | 193 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#749,045
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#643
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,272
of 327,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#22
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.