↓ Skip to main content

Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: Analysis of Percutaneous Transcatheter Techniques and Current Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: Analysis of Percutaneous Transcatheter Techniques and Current Outcomes
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, February 2020
DOI 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.02.036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Engineering 2 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
#876
of 3,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,879
of 382,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
#39
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.