↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Aging and peripheral lipopolysaccharide can modulate epigenetic regulators and decrease IL-1β promoter DNA methylation in microglia
Published in
Neurobiology of Aging, July 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.07.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In aged mice, peripheral stimulation of the innate immune system with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) causes exaggerated neuroinflammation and prolonged sickness behavior due in part to microglial dysfunction. Epigenetic changes to DNA may play a role in microglial dysfunction; therefore, we sought to determine whether aged microglia displayed DNA hypomethylation of the interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) promoter and altered expression of epigenetic regulators. We further examined whether the demethylating agent 5-azacytidine induced IL-1β expression in BV2 and primary microglia similar to microglia from aged mice. Novel findings indicated that aged mice had decreased methylation of the IL-1β gene promoter in primary microglia basally or following systemic LPS that is associated with increased IL-1β mRNA, intracellular IL-1β production, as well as prolonged sickness behavior. Last, 5-azacytidine increased IL-1β gene expression and decreased DNA methylation of BV2 and primary microglial cells similar to microglia from aged mice. Taken together, these data indicate that DNA methylation promotes heightened microglial activation in the aged brain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 25%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 27 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 33 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neurobiology of Aging
#3,444
of 4,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,838
of 372,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurobiology of Aging
#59
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.