You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why is Tree Drought Mortality so Hard to Predict?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tree.2021.02.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna T Trugman, Leander D L Anderegg, William R L Anderegg, Adrian J Das, Nathan L Stephenson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 251 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 68 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 61 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 86 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,633,860
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1,802
of 3,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,948
of 454,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#23
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.