You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hemodynamic and Echocardiographic Evaluation of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation With the Modified Bicaval Anastomosis Technique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-08-1098 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Soichiro Kitamura, Takeshi Nakatani, Tomoko Kato, Masanobu Yanase, Junjiro Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Nakajima, Toshihiro Funatsu, Koichi Toda, Akiko Kada, Hitoshi Ogino, Toshikatsu Yagihara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 22% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Design | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2021.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,294
of 2,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,271
of 104,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.