↓ Skip to main content

Best practice in clinical facilitation of undergraduate nursing students

Overview of attention for article published in Nurse Education in Practice, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Best practice in clinical facilitation of undergraduate nursing students
Published in
Nurse Education in Practice, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.08.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Lecturer 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 60 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 71 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 65 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Nurse Education in Practice
#624
of 1,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,076
of 355,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nurse Education in Practice
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.