Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows researchers to observe structural pathology that may predict cognitive decline. Some populations are less accessible through traditional in-person visits, and may be under-represented in the literature.
We examined white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHV) and cerebral parenchymal fraction (CPF) as predictors of cognitive decline measured by a modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) in the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study, a racially and ethnically diverse cohort study. Participants were stroke-free, above 50 years old, and had no contraindications to MRI. A total of 1143 participants had MRI and TICS-m data available [mean age 70 (SD=9), 61% women, 66% Hispanic, 17% Black, 15% white].
Those in the third and fourth quartiles of WMHV had significantly greater decline in TICS-m over time as compared with those in the first quartile (Q3: -0.17 points/year, Q4: -0.30 points/year). Those in the bottom 2 quartiles of CPF had significantly greater decline in TICS-m than those in the top quartile (Q1: -0.3 points/year, Q2: -0.2 points/year). Apolipoprotein E (APOE) e4 allele carriers had greater cognitive decline per unit of CPF. Those with greater CPF preserve TICS-m performance better despite greater WMHV.
Telephone cognitive assessments can detect decline due to white matter lesions and smaller brain volumes.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,075,356
of 27,306,025 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
#109
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,661
of 422,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,306,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
