↓ Skip to main content

Temporal–spatial mean-shift clustering analysis to improve functional MRI activation detection

Overview of attention for article published in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (0730725X), July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Temporal–spatial mean-shift clustering analysis to improve functional MRI activation detection
Published in
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (0730725X), July 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.mri.2016.07.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cluster analysis (CA) is often used in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis to improve detection of functional activations. Commonly used clustering techniques typically only consider spatial information of a statistical parametric image (SPI) in their calculations. This study examines incorporating the temporal characteristics of acquired fMRI data with mean-shift clustering (MSC) for fMRI analysis to enhance activation detections. Simulated data and real fMRI data was used to compare the commonly used cluster analysis with MSC using a feature space containing temporal characteristics. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves show that improvements in low contrast to noise scenarios using MSC over CA and our previous MSC technique at all tested simulated activation sizes. The proposed MSC technique with a feature space using both temporal and spatial data characteristics shows improved activation detection for both simulated and real Blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) fMRI data (approximately 60% increase). The proposed techniques are useful in techniques that inherently have low contrast to noise ratios, such as non-proton imaging or high resolution BOLD fMRI.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Psychology 2 14%
Neuroscience 2 14%
Computer Science 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2016.
All research outputs
#11,142,505
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (0730725X)
#707
of 2,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,968
of 335,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (0730725X)
#10
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,355 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.