↓ Skip to main content

Management of Spinal Deformity in Adult Patients With Neuromuscular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in JAAOS: Journal of the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Management of Spinal Deformity in Adult Patients With Neuromuscular Disease
Published in
JAAOS: Journal of the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons, September 2016
DOI 10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00421
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A wide range of neuromuscular diseases, including Parkinson disease, cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and myopathy, are associated with spinal deformities. The most common postural deformities include anterocollis, Pisa syndrome (pleurothotonus), scoliosis, and camptocormia. Nonsurgical management of spinal deformity in patients with neuromuscular disease centers on maximizing the medical management of the underlying neurodegenerative pathology before surgical intervention is contemplated. Surgical management can include decompression alone, or decompression and fusion with short or long fusion constructs. Patients with neuromuscular disease are susceptible to postoperative medical complications, such as delirium, epidural hematomas, pulmonary emboli, and cardiac events. Compared with outcomes in the typical patient with spinal deformity, postoperative outcomes in patients with neuromuscular disease have higher rates of surgical complications, such as instrumentation failure, proximal junctional kyphosis, loss of correction, and the need for revision surgery, regardless of the magnitude of surgical treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Thailand 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 19%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 51%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#31,228,352
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from JAAOS: Journal of the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons
#2,531
of 2,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,402
of 337,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAAOS: Journal of the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.