↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Acute Bronchitis Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
24 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evidence-Based Acute Bronchitis Therapy
Published in
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 2012
DOI 10.1177/0897190012460826
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Acute bronchitis is a disease characterized by inflammation of the large airways within the lung accompanied by a cough lasting from 1 to 3 weeks. The inflammation occurs as a result of an airway infection or environmental trigger, with viral infections accounting for an estimated 89% to 95% of cases. Symptomatic treatment of cough is primarily required for patients, though in most cases the condition is self-limiting. Therapy consists of both nonpharmacological and pharmacological options to include antibiotics and antivirals, antitussive agents, protussive agents, and beta-2-agonists. This article reviews the treatment options for acute bronchitis and recommends criteria for use.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 33 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 36 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2026.
All research outputs
#3,925,275
of 26,445,486 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmacy Practice
#131
of 1,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,358
of 192,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmacy Practice
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.