↓ Skip to main content

Comorbidity and Ventricular and Vascular Structure and Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Heart Failure, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comorbidity and Ventricular and Vascular Structure and Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published in
Circulation: Heart Failure, October 2012
DOI 10.1161/circheartfailure.112.968594
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) display increased adiposity and multiple comorbidities, factors that in themselves may influence cardiovascular structure and function. This has sparked debate as to whether HFpEF represents a distinct disease or an amalgamation of comorbidities. We hypothesized that fundamental cardiovascular structural and functional alterations are characteristic of HFpEF, even after accounting for body size and comorbidities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 42 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,504,908
of 32,375,021 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Heart Failure
#688
of 1,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,217
of 220,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Heart Failure
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,375,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.