↓ Skip to main content

Genome sequences of the human body louse and its primary endosymbiont provide insights into the permanent parasitic lifestyle

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
534 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genome sequences of the human body louse and its primary endosymbiont provide insights into the permanent parasitic lifestyle
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1003379107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 534 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 495 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 122 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 113 21%
Student > Master 55 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 39 7%
Student > Bachelor 31 6%
Other 94 18%
Unknown 80 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 254 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 13%
Engineering 15 3%
Materials Science 14 3%
Chemistry 14 3%
Other 73 14%
Unknown 93 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2026.
All research outputs
#967,405
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#14,519
of 119,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,654
of 151,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#46
of 754 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 754 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.