↓ Skip to main content

Decision‐making related to complementary and alternative medicine use by people with Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Decision‐making related to complementary and alternative medicine use by people with Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, October 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04339.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To explore how complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) users make decisions about CAM use. Specifically, an exploration of the processes used by people with Type 2 diabetes, related to the assessment of information sources, factors influencing decision-making and the role of other key individuals, was undertaken.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Lecturer 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 24%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Psychology 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,102,862
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#4,715
of 5,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,122
of 189,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#54
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.