↓ Skip to main content

Food commodities from microalgae

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
723 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Food commodities from microalgae
Published in
Current Opinion in Biotechnology, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.09.012
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The prospect of sustainable production of food ingredients from photoautotrophic microalgae was reviewed. Clearly, there is scope for microalgal oils to replace functions of major vegetable oils, and in addition to deliver health benefits to food products. Furthermore, with a limited production surface, a substantial portion of the European Union market could be supplied with edible oils and proteins from microalgae. Yet, before microalgal ingredients can become genuinely sustainable and cost effective alternatives for current food commodities, major breakthroughs in production technology and in biorefinery approaches are required. Moreover, before market introduction, evidence on safety of novel microalgal ingredients, is needed. In general, we conclude that microalgae have a great potential as a sustainable feedstock for food commodities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 723 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 703 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 132 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 113 16%
Researcher 94 13%
Student > Bachelor 82 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 6%
Other 87 12%
Unknown 174 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 206 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 76 11%
Engineering 75 10%
Environmental Science 50 7%
Chemistry 28 4%
Other 72 10%
Unknown 216 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,624,144
of 28,103,144 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Biotechnology
#604
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,025
of 200,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Biotechnology
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,103,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.