You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Response of Colorado River runoff to dust radiative forcing in snow
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0913139107 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas H. Painter, Jeffrey S. Deems, Jayne Belnap, Alan F. Hamlet, Christopher C. Landry, Bradley Udall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 3% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 307 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 83 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 20 | 6% |
| Professor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 118 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 75 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 11% |
| Engineering | 14 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 412. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#72,427
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,742
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132
of 110,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5
of 660 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 660 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.