↓ Skip to main content

Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
6 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
patent
38 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
1224 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease
Published in
Nature Genetics, April 2011
DOI 10.1038/ng.801
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam C Naj, Gyungah Jun, Gary W Beecham, Li-San Wang, Badri Narayan Vardarajan, Jacqueline Buros, Paul J Gallins, Joseph D Buxbaum, Gail P Jarvik, Paul K Crane, Eric B Larson, Thomas D Bird, Bradley F Boeve, Neill R Graff-Radford, Philip L De Jager, Denis Evans, Julie A Schneider, Minerva M Carrasquillo, Nilufer Ertekin-Taner, Steven G Younkin, Carlos Cruchaga, John S K Kauwe, Petra Nowotny, Patricia Kramer, John Hardy, Matthew J Huentelman, Amanda J Myers, Michael M Barmada, F Yesim Demirci, Clinton T Baldwin, Robert C Green, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Peter St George-Hyslop, Steven E Arnold, Robert Barber, Thomas Beach, Eileen H Bigio, James D Bowen, Adam Boxer, James R Burke, Nigel J Cairns, Chris S Carlson, Regina M Carney, Steven L Carroll, Helena C Chui, David G Clark, Jason Corneveaux, Carl W Cotman, Jeffrey L Cummings, Charles DeCarli, Steven T DeKosky, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, Malcolm Dick, Dennis W Dickson, William G Ellis, Kelley M Faber, Kenneth B Fallon, Martin R Farlow, Steven Ferris, Matthew P Frosch, Douglas R Galasko, Mary Ganguli, Marla Gearing, Daniel H Geschwind, Bernardino Ghetti, John R Gilbert, Sid Gilman, Bruno Giordani, Jonathan D Glass, John H Growdon, Ronald L Hamilton, Lindy E Harrell, Elizabeth Head, Lawrence S Honig, Christine M Hulette, Bradley T Hyman, Gregory A Jicha, Lee-Way Jin, Nancy Johnson, Jason Karlawish, Anna Karydas, Jeffrey A Kaye, Ronald Kim, Edward H Koo, Neil W Kowall, James J Lah, Allan I Levey, Andrew P Lieberman, Oscar L Lopez, Wendy J Mack, Daniel C Marson, Frank Martiniuk, Deborah C Mash, Eliezer Masliah, Wayne C McCormick, Susan M McCurry, Andrew N McDavid, Ann C McKee, Marsel Mesulam, Bruce L Miller, Carol A Miller, Joshua W Miller, Joseph E Parisi, Daniel P Perl, Elaine Peskind, Ronald C Petersen, Wayne W Poon, Joseph F Quinn, Ruchita A Rajbhandary, Murray Raskind, Barry Reisberg, John M Ringman, Erik D Roberson, Roger N Rosenberg, Mary Sano, Lon S Schneider, William Seeley, Michael L Shelanski, Michael A Slifer, Charles D Smith, Joshua A Sonnen, Salvatore Spina, Robert A Stern, Rudolph E Tanzi, John Q Trojanowski, Juan C Troncoso, Vivianna M Van Deerlin, Harry V Vinters, Jean Paul Vonsattel, Sandra Weintraub, Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer, Jennifer Williamson, Randall L Woltjer, Laura B Cantwell, Beth A Dombroski, Duane Beekly, Kathryn L Lunetta, Eden R Martin, M Ilyas Kamboh, Andrew J Saykin, Eric M Reiman, David A Bennett, John C Morris, Thomas J Montine, Alison M Goate, Deborah Blacker, Debby W Tsuang, Hakon Hakonarson, Walter A Kukull, Tatiana M Foroud, Jonathan L Haines, Richard Mayeux, Margaret A Pericak-Vance, Lindsay A Farrer, Gerard D Schellenberg

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 25 2%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 1164 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 249 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 248 20%
Student > Master 126 10%
Student > Bachelor 91 7%
Professor 62 5%
Other 204 17%
Unknown 244 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 277 23%
Neuroscience 189 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 178 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 128 10%
Chemistry 25 2%
Other 122 10%
Unknown 305 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2026.
All research outputs
#886,131
of 33,849,731 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,536
of 8,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,853
of 158,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#3
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,849,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.