You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1197754 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michele J. Gelfand, Jana L. Raver, Lisa Nishii, Lisa M. Leslie, Janetta Lun, Beng Chong Lim, Lili Duan, Assaf Almaliach, Soon Ang, Jakobina Arnadottir, Zeynep Aycan, Klaus Boehnke, Pawel Boski, Rosa Cabecinhas, Darius Chan, Jagdeep Chhokar, Alessia D’Amato, Montse Ferrer, Iris C. Fischlmayr, Ronald Fischer, Marta Fülöp, James Georgas, Emiko S. Kashima, Yoshishima Kashima, Kibum Kim, Alain Lempereur, Patricia Marquez, Rozhan Othman, Bert Overlaet, Penny Panagiotopoulou, Karl Peltzer, Lorena R. Perez-Florizno, Larisa Ponomarenko, Anu Realo, Vidar Schei, Manfred Schmitt, Peter B. Smith, Nazar Soomro, Erna Szabo, Nalinee Taveesin, Midori Toyama, Evert Van de Vliert, Naharika Vohra, Colleen Ward, Susumu Yamaguchi |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Norway | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 69% |
| Scientists | 16 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,008 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
| Germany | 8 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1925 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 438 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 226 | 11% |
| Researcher | 209 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 174 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 112 | 6% |
| Other | 402 | 20% |
| Unknown | 447 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 569 | 28% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 294 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 223 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 61 | 3% |
| Other | 241 | 12% |
| Unknown | 537 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1063. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2026.
All research outputs
#18,241
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from Science
#873
of 93,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32
of 162,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#1
of 487 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 487 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.