You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence for landscape-level, pollen-mediated gene flow from genetically modified creeping bentgrass with CP4 EPSPS as a marker
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0405154101 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lidia S. Watrud, E. Henry Lee, Anne Fairbrother, Connie Burdick, Jay R. Reichman, Mike Bollman, Marjorie Storm, George King, Peter K. Van de Water |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Gambia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 61 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 137 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#815,039
of 24,776,799 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#13,262
of 101,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#817
of 71,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#22
of 485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,776,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.