You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature09744 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael F. Berger, Michael S. Lawrence, Francesca Demichelis, Yotam Drier, Kristian Cibulskis, Andrey Y. Sivachenko, Andrea Sboner, Raquel Esgueva, Dorothee Pflueger, Carrie Sougnez, Robert Onofrio, Scott L. Carter, Kyung Park, Lukas Habegger, Lauren Ambrogio, Timothy Fennell, Melissa Parkin, Gordon Saksena, Douglas Voet, Alex H. Ramos, Trevor J. Pugh, Jane Wilkinson, Sheila Fisher, Wendy Winckler, Scott Mahan, Kristin Ardlie, Jennifer Baldwin, Jonathan W. Simons, Naoki Kitabayashi, Theresa Y. MacDonald, Philip W. Kantoff, Lynda Chin, Stacey B. Gabriel, Mark B. Gerstein, Todd R. Golub, Matthew Meyerson, Ashutosh Tewari, Eric S. Lander, Gad Getz, Mark A. Rubin, Levi A. Garraway |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 58% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 35 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | <1% |
| Canada | 8 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| China | 5 | <1% |
| Belgium | 4 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 24 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1133 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 343 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 255 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 96 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 79 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 73 | 6% |
| Other | 242 | 20% |
| Unknown | 150 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 510 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 214 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 194 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 44 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 26 | 2% |
| Other | 72 | 6% |
| Unknown | 178 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2025.
All research outputs
#1,154,067
of 31,814,824 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#35,839
of 112,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,039
of 239,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#94
of 657 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,814,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 97.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 657 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.