You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Internal Cave Gating for Protection of Colonies of the Endangered Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Chiropterologica, June 2003
|
DOI | 10.3161/001.005.0112 |
Authors |
Keith W. Martin, David M. Leslie, Mark E. Payton, William L. Puckette, Steve L. Hensley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Israel | 1 | 2% |
Bulgaria | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 32% |
Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 55% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Acta Chiropterologica
#153
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,521
of 55,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Chiropterologica
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them