↓ Skip to main content

Autonomous Circuitry for Substrate Exploration in Freely Moving Drosophila Larvae

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Autonomous Circuitry for Substrate Exploration in Freely Moving Drosophila Larvae
Published in
Current Biology, August 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.048
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Many organisms, from bacteria to human hunter-gatherers, use specialized random walk strategies to explore their environment. Such behaviors are an efficient stratagem for sampling the environment and usually consist of an alternation between straight runs and turns that redirect these runs. Drosophila larvae execute an exploratory routine of this kind that consists of sequences of straight crawls, pauses, turns, and redirected crawls. Central pattern generating networks underlying rhythmic movements are distributed along the anteroposterior axis of the nervous system. The way in which the operation of these networks is incorporated into extended behavioral routines such as substrate exploration has not yet been explored. In particular, the part played by the brain in dictating the sequence of movements required is unknown.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 4 2%
Japan 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 242 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 27%
Researcher 51 20%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Student > Master 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 40 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 47%
Neuroscience 56 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 7%
Physics and Astronomy 6 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 43 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,622,393
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#6,461
of 14,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,204
of 187,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#58
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.