↓ Skip to main content

A differential effect of 2 probiotics in the prevention of eczema and atopy: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
patent
30 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A differential effect of 2 probiotics in the prevention of eczema and atopy: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, August 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.07.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 374 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 64 17%
Researcher 51 13%
Student > Master 46 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 8%
Other 59 15%
Unknown 97 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 5%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 116 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2025.
All research outputs
#1,312,712
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#1,093
of 14,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,809
of 135,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#5
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.