↓ Skip to main content

The transcriptional network that controls growth arrest and differentiation in a human myeloid leukemia cell line

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
patent
7 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
755 Mendeley
citeulike
27 CiteULike
connotea
6 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The transcriptional network that controls growth arrest and differentiation in a human myeloid leukemia cell line
Published in
Nature Genetics, April 2009
DOI 10.1038/ng.375
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harukazu Suzuki, Alistair R R Forrest, Erik van Nimwegen, Carsten O Daub, Piotr J Balwierz, Katharine M Irvine, Timo Lassmann, Timothy Ravasi, Yuki Hasegawa, Michiel J L de Hoon, Shintaro Katayama, Kate Schroder, Piero Carninci, Yasuhiro Tomaru, Mutsumi Kanamori-Katayama, Atsutaka Kubosaki, Altuna Akalin, Yoshinari Ando, Erik Arner, Maki Asada, Hiroshi Asahara, Timothy Bailey, Vladimir B Bajic, Denis Bauer, Anthony G Beckhouse, Nicolas Bertin, Johan Björkegren, Frank Brombacher, Erika Bulger, Alistair M Chalk, Joe Chiba, Nicole Cloonan, Adam Dawe, Josee Dostie, Pär G Engström, Magbubah Essack, Geoffrey J Faulkner, J Lynn Fink, David Fredman, Ko Fujimori, Masaaki Furuno, Takashi Gojobori, Julian Gough, Sean M Grimmond, Mika Gustafsson, Megumi Hashimoto, Takehiro Hashimoto, Mariko Hatakeyama, Susanne Heinzel, Winston Hide, Oliver Hofmann, Michael Hörnquist, Lukasz Huminiecki, Kazuho Ikeo, Naoko Imamoto, Satoshi Inoue, Yusuke Inoue, Ryoko Ishihara, Takao Iwayanagi, Anders Jacobsen, Mandeep Kaur, Hideya Kawaji, Markus C Kerr, Ryuichiro Kimura, Syuhei Kimura, Yasumasa Kimura, Hiroaki Kitano, Hisashi Koga, Toshio Kojima, Shinji Kondo, Takeshi Konno, Anders Krogh, Adele Kruger, Ajit Kumar, Boris Lenhard, Andreas Lennartsson, Morten Lindow, Marina Lizio, Cameron MacPherson, Norihiro Maeda, Christopher A Maher, Monique Maqungo, Jessica Mar, Nicholas A Matigian, Hideo Matsuda, John S Mattick, Stuart Meier, Sei Miyamoto, Etsuko Miyamoto-Sato, Kazuhiko Nakabayashi, Yutaka Nakachi, Mika Nakano, Sanne Nygaard, Toshitsugu Okayama, Yasushi Okazaki, Haruka Okuda-Yabukami, Valerio Orlando, Jun Otomo, Mikhail Pachkov, Nikolai Petrovsky, Charles Plessy, John Quackenbush, Aleksandar Radovanovic, Michael Rehli, Rintaro Saito, Albin Sandelin, Sebastian Schmeier, Christian Schönbach, Ariel S Schwartz, Colin A Semple, Miho Sera, Jessica Severin, Katsuhiko Shirahige, Cas Simons, George St. Laurent, Masanori Suzuki, Takahiro Suzuki, Matthew J Sweet, Ryan J Taft, Shizu Takeda, Yoichi Takenaka, Kai Tan, Martin S Taylor, Rohan D Teasdale, Jesper Tegnér, Sarah Teichmann, Eivind Valen, Claes Wahlestedt, Kazunori Waki, Andrew Waterhouse, Christine A Wells, Ole Winther, Linda Wu, Kazumi Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Yanagawa, Jun Yasuda, Mihaela Zavolan, David A Hume, Takahiro Arakawa, Shiro Fukuda, Kengo Imamura, Chikatoshi Kai, Ai Kaiho, Tsugumi Kawashima, Chika Kawazu, Yayoi Kitazume, Miki Kojima, Hisashi Miura, Kayoko Murakami, Mitsuyoshi Murata, Noriko Ninomiya, Hiromi Nishiyori, Shohei Noma, Chihiro Ogawa, Takuma Sano, Christophe Simon, Michihira Tagami, Yukari Takahashi, Jun Kawai, Yoshihide Hayashizaki

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 755 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 23 3%
Japan 12 2%
United Kingdom 9 1%
Germany 8 1%
Sweden 5 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Hong Kong 2 <1%
Other 21 3%
Unknown 666 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 235 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 164 22%
Student > Master 56 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 56 7%
Professor 53 7%
Other 124 16%
Unknown 67 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 383 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 139 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 8%
Computer Science 31 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 2%
Other 53 7%
Unknown 78 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,577,135
of 30,697,671 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#2,345
of 8,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,090
of 128,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#10
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,697,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.