| Title |
Trees and networks before and after Darwin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Direct, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6150-4-43 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark A Ragan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 28% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Peru | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 163 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2023.
All research outputs
#719,815
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#13
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,554
of 96,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them