↓ Skip to main content

Circadian neuron feedback controls the Drosophila sleep–activity profile

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
72 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Circadian neuron feedback controls the Drosophila sleep–activity profile
Published in
Nature, August 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature19097
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Little is known about the ability of Drosophila circadian neurons to promote sleep. Here we show, using optogenetic manipulation and video recording, that a subset of dorsal clock neurons (DN1s) are potent sleep-promoting cells that release glutamate to directly inhibit key pacemaker neurons. The pacemakers promote morning arousal by activating these DN1s, implying that a late-day feedback circuit drives midday siesta and night-time sleep. To investigate more plastic aspects of the sleep program, we used a calcium assay to monitor and compare the real-time activity of DN1 neurons in freely behaving males and females. Our results revealed that DN1 neurons were more active in males than in females, consistent with the finding that male flies sleep more during the day. DN1 activity is also enhanced by elevated temperature, consistent with the ability of higher temperatures to increase sleep. These new approaches indicate that DN1s have a major effect on the fly sleep-wake profile and integrate environmental information with the circadian molecular program.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 365 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 23%
Researcher 63 17%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Student > Master 24 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 92 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 106 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 21 6%
Unknown 94 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#752,591
of 34,242,763 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#29,098
of 117,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,511
of 335,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#499
of 972 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,242,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 972 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.