↓ Skip to main content

Habitat Assessment for Giant Pandas in the Qinling Mountain Region of China

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Habitat Assessment for Giant Pandas in the Qinling Mountain Region of China
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2010
DOI 10.2193/2008-186
Authors

TIAN‐TIAN FENG, FRANK T. VAN MANEN, NA‐XUN ZHAO, MING LI, FU‐WEN WEI

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
India 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 116 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 55%
Environmental Science 31 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 18 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,385,249
of 24,811,707 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#276
of 2,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,486
of 192,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#18
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,707 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.