↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An investigation into plasmolysis in the oomycete Achlya bisexualis reveals that membrane–wall attachment points are sensitive to peptides containing the sequence RGD and that cell wall deposition can occur despite retraction of the protoplast
Published in
Canadian Journal of Microbiology, October 2012
DOI 10.1139/w2012-099
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The structure and function of membrane-wall attachment sites in walled cells, and how these relate to animal focal adhesions, is an area that is poorly understood. In view of this, we investigated how membrane-wall attachments that form upon plasmolysis, respond to peptides that disrupt animal focal adhesions. The degree of cytoplasmic disruption during plasmolysis was also investigated. Upon hyperosmotic challenge, the protoplast in hyphae of the oomycete Achlya bisexualis typically retracted incompletely due to membrane-wall attachments. The inclusion, in the plasmolysing solution, of peptides containing the sequence RGD disrupted these attachments in a dose-dependent manner. In some hyphae, protoplast retraction stopped temporarily at attachment points - upon resumption of retraction, material was left that traced the outline of the static protoplast. Staining of this material with fluorescence brightener indicated the presence of cellulose, which suggests that wall deposition was able to occur despite plasmolysis. The F-actin cytoskeleton was disrupted during plasmolysis; peripheral F-actin staining was observed, but there was no distinct F-actin cap; staining was more diffuse; and there were fewer plaques compared with nonplasmolysed hyphae. Our data indicate that membrane-wall attachment points are sensitive to RGD-containing peptides and that wall deposition continues despite protoplast retraction and F-actin disruption.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Librarian 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Design 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Microbiology
#1,867
of 2,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,590
of 191,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Microbiology
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.