↓ Skip to main content

Climate change perils for dioecious plant species

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Plants, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Climate change perils for dioecious plant species
Published in
Nature Plants, August 2016
DOI 10.1038/nplants.2016.109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin R. Hultine, Kevin C. Grady, Troy E. Wood, Stephen M. Shuster, John C. Stella, Thomas G. Whitham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 33 25%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 51%
Environmental Science 22 17%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,318,087
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#1,034
of 2,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,755
of 386,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#23
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.