↓ Skip to main content

RecA-independent recombination is efficient but limited by exonucleases

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RecA-independent recombination is efficient but limited by exonucleases
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2007
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0608293104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Germany 2 1%
Poland 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 150 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 26%
Researcher 43 26%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Master 16 10%
Professor 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#10,711,062
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#78,727
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,009
of 228,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#430
of 633 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 633 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.