↓ Skip to main content

Poxvirus cGAMP nucleases: Clues and mysteries from a stolen gene

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Pathogens, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Poxvirus cGAMP nucleases: Clues and mysteries from a stolen gene
Published in
PLoS Pathogens, March 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009372
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#27,745,776
of 34,378,656 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#10,032
of 11,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#372,937
of 496,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#228
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,378,656 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.