The ‘Non-English database’ is part of the InvaCost project (1) that compiles cost information associated with biological invasions. These records describe cost estimates reported in documents written in ten languages other than English (i.e. Chinese, French, German, Greek, Japanese, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Dutch, and Ukrainian). An updated version of this database is now incorporated within the core InvaCost Database (3).CONTENT: This page contains (a) the original version of the 'InvaCost_Non-English database' and (b) full definition and details about the descriptive columns used in this database (‘Descriptors’ file).METHODOLOGY: The methodology was similar to the one used to compile the original version of InvaCost (2), but targeting more national webpages and specific literature databases, as well as directly contacting stakeholders that could provide data. The search was carried out by native speakers. Entries were checked by two contributors, except for the entries in Ukrainian and Greek. These ‘non-English’ searches originally resulted in 356 documents and 5,212 entries.UPDATES, RECOMMENDATIONS & CAUTION: Please consider information already described elsewhere (3) for the original InvaCost database. RELATED LINKS AND PUBLICATIONS:1. Diagne C, Catford JA, Essl F, Nuñez MA, Courchamp F (2020) What are the economic costs of biological invasions? A complex topic requiring international and interdisciplinary expertise. NeoBiota 63: 25–37. https://doiorg/10.3897/neobiota.63.552602. Diagne,
C., Leroy, B., Gozlan, R.E. et al. InvaCost,
a public database of the economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Sci
Data 7, 277 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00586-z3.Database: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/InvaCost_References_and_description_of_economic_cost_estimates_associated_with_biological_invasions_worldwide_/12668570
4. Researchgate page: https://www.researchgate.net/project/InvaCost-assessing-the-economic-costs-of-biological-invasions5. InvaCost workshop: https://www.biodiversitydynamics.fr/invacost-workshop/
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from figshare
#15,556
of 25,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,881
of 429,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from figshare
#304
of 582 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 582 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
