↓ Skip to main content

The paradox of a wide nasal aperture in cold-adapted Neandertals: a causal assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Evolution, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The paradox of a wide nasal aperture in cold-adapted Neandertals: a causal assessment
Published in
Journal of Human Evolution, October 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.07.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Moldova, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 137 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Professor 10 7%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 22%
Arts and Humanities 29 20%
Social Sciences 26 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 24 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2026.
All research outputs
#944,330
of 29,908,093 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Evolution
#308
of 2,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,978
of 117,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Evolution
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,908,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.