↓ Skip to main content

Sibling composition and children's anthropometric indicators of nutritional status: Evidence from native Amazonians in Bolivia

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Human Biology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sibling composition and children's anthropometric indicators of nutritional status: Evidence from native Amazonians in Bolivia
Published in
Annals of Human Biology, October 2012
DOI 10.3109/03014460.2012.728621
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Siblings compete for parental resources. Little is known about how sibling composition (older sisters, older brothers, younger sisters, younger brothers) might affect child anthropometric indicators of nutritional status.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 22 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,737,203
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Human Biology
#533
of 787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,986
of 183,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Human Biology
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.