↓ Skip to main content

Population Size Does Not Influence Mitochondrial Genetic Diversity in Animals

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
53 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
988 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Population Size Does Not Influence Mitochondrial Genetic Diversity in Animals
Published in
Science, April 2006
DOI 10.1126/science.1122033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 988 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 26 3%
Brazil 9 <1%
Spain 7 <1%
Switzerland 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Australia 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Sweden 4 <1%
Portugal 4 <1%
Other 25 3%
Unknown 891 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 260 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 222 22%
Student > Master 105 11%
Student > Bachelor 79 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 68 7%
Other 149 15%
Unknown 105 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 633 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 113 11%
Environmental Science 60 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 <1%
Arts and Humanities 6 <1%
Other 38 4%
Unknown 130 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,088,396
of 32,436,126 outputs
Outputs from Science
#19,723
of 92,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,752
of 116,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#39
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,436,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.