↓ Skip to main content

Categorical perception of color is lateralized to the right hemisphere in infants, but to the left hemisphere in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Categorical perception of color is lateralized to the right hemisphere in infants, but to the left hemisphere in adults
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2008
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0712286105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 13 5%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Japan 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 257 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 20%
Researcher 48 17%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Student > Master 30 11%
Professor 16 6%
Other 59 21%
Unknown 36 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 130 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 10%
Neuroscience 21 7%
Linguistics 19 7%
Computer Science 8 3%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 45 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2024.
All research outputs
#1,454,794
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#19,758
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,301
of 136,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#72
of 716 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 716 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.