Increased extravascular lung water (EVLW) is seen as B-lines on chest ultrasonography. In lowlanders ascending to altitude the time course, relationship with the patient's clinical status and factors affecting B-lines are still unclear. The aim was to monitor B-lines, clinical status and N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) during exposure to high altitude.
Chest ultrasonography, blood samples, cardiovascular parameters, and signs and symptoms of high altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPE) were prospectively assessed in 19 participants at baseline and after ascent to 3830 m (9, 24, 48, 72 h, and 8 days) by blinded investigators. Potential confounding factors (e.g. altitude variations, physical effort) were minimized. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyse factors associated with B-lines. B-lines changed with exposure to altitude (P = 0.006) in a parabolic-like pattern within the first 72 h; 10 of 18 participants (55.6%) had >5 B-lines at 24 h. B-lines were correlated with the number of signs and symptoms (partial coefficient = 0.372, P = 0.001). B-lines were associated with time (P = 0.038), sex (P = 0.013), and SpO2 (P = 0.042), but not with NT-proBNP (P = 0.546). The participant with a clinical diagnosis of HAPE had 23 B-lines.
B-lines during exposure to altitude seem to reflect the individual response to hypobaric hypoxia and represent clinically relevant alterations at high altitude, also in patients with HAPE. Similar to previous studies, our results support a non-cardiogenic aetiology of B-lines.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,857,703
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,194
of 2,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,892
of 264,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
#25
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
