You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coffee and Tea Intake and Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: Pooled Analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0191 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlotta Galeone, Alessandra Tavani, Claudio Pelucchi, Federica Turati, Deborah M. Winn, Fabio Levi, Guo-Pei Yu, Hal Morgenstern, Karl Kelsey, Luigino Dal Maso, Mark P. Purdue, Michael McClean, Renato Talamini, Richard B. Hayes, Silvia Franceschi, Stimson Schantz, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Gilles Ferro, Shu-Chun Chuang, Paolo Boffetta, Carlo La Vecchia, Mia Hashibe |
| Abstract |
Only a few studies have explored the relation between coffee and tea intake and head and neck cancers, with inconsistent results. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 17 | 44% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Barbados | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 97% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#365,645
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#138
of 4,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#906
of 105,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.