↓ Skip to main content

経口腸管洗浄剤の含有成分マクロゴール4000によるアナフィラキシーショックの1例

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
経口腸管洗浄剤の含有成分マクロゴール4000によるアナフィラキシーショックの1例
Published in
Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology, January 2019
DOI 10.11405/nisshoshi.116.330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shohei Ouchi, Hideharu Ogiyama, Shusaku Tsutsui, Ayaka Nasu, Kayo Seto, Masashi Horiki, Tamana Sanomura, Kazuho Imanaka, Yoko Murayama, Hiroyasu Iishi

Abstract

A 44-year-old man was administered Niflec® containing macrogol 4000 as a bowel cleanser for colonoscopic examination. Immediately after ingestion, he experienced oral cavity discomfort and nasal congestion, followed by acute urticaria and presyncope. His systolic blood pressure and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation dropped to 66mmHg and 89%, respectively. Fluid infusion, as well as steroid and epinephrine administration, improved his symptoms. Skin prick tests were then performed using Niflec®, macrogol 4000, and Actosin® ointment (containing macrogol 4000), all of which were positive. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with anaphylactic shock caused by macrogol 4000 included in Niflec®. Macrogol present in bowel cleansers used for colonoscopy rarely causes anaphylactic shock. However, clinicians need to be mindful of this risk. Prompt and appropriate treatment is needed should this condition occur.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Unspecified 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,920,631
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology
#93
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,402
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them