↓ Skip to main content

Routine use of oxygen in the treatment of myocardial infarction: systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
3 Redditors
guideline
4 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Routine use of oxygen in the treatment of myocardial infarction: systematic review
Published in
Heart, November 2008
DOI 10.1136/hrt.2008.148742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 182 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 18%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Master 24 13%
Other 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 50 26%
Unknown 18 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 25 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,414,514
of 31,936,881 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#758
of 7,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,867
of 227,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,936,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.