You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology Letters, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ele.13732 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ivan Paz‐Vinas, Evelyn L. Jensen, Laura D. Bertola, Martin F. Breed, Brian K. Hand, Margaret E. Hunter, Francine Kershaw, Deborah M. Leigh, Gordon Luikart, Joachim Mergeay, Joshua M. Miller, Charles B. Van Rees, Gernot Segelbacher, Sean Hoban |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Greece | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 65% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 35% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,474,071
of 24,637,659 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#1,673
of 3,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,026
of 429,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#52
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,637,659 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.