↓ Skip to main content

Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the (1→3) β-D-Glucan Assay as an Aid to Diagnosis of Fungal Infections in Humans

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the (1→3) β-D-Glucan Assay as an Aid to Diagnosis of Fungal Infections in Humans
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, July 2005
DOI 10.1086/432470
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 3 1%
India 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
El Salvador 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 232 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Other 21 9%
Lecturer 17 7%
Other 66 27%
Unknown 56 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 60 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2025.
All research outputs
#849,081
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1,476
of 21,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,054
of 101,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#4
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.