You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Common Scaling Rule for Abundance, Energetics, and Production of Parasitic and Free-Living Species
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.1204337 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ryan F. Hechinger, Kevin D. Lafferty, Andy P. Dobson, James H. Brown, Armand M. Kuris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 19 | 7% |
Brazil | 8 | 3% |
Canada | 4 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 4% |
Unknown | 227 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 30% |
Researcher | 68 | 24% |
Professor | 25 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 23 | 8% |
Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
Other | 39 | 14% |
Unknown | 17 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 162 | 58% |
Environmental Science | 59 | 21% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 1% |
Other | 11 | 4% |
Unknown | 29 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2013.
All research outputs
#2,307,245
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Science
#28,843
of 78,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,203
of 120,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#263
of 609 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 609 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.