↓ Skip to main content

Bardet–Biedl syndrome type 4 (BBS4)-null mice implicate Bbs4 in flagella formation but not global cilia assembly

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bardet–Biedl syndrome type 4 (BBS4)-null mice implicate Bbs4 in flagella formation but not global cilia assembly
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2004
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0402354101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 28%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 26 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,768,447
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#60,121
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,677
of 88,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#275
of 620 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 620 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.