↓ Skip to main content

A Microbial Arsenic Cycle in a Salt-Saturated, Extreme Environment

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Microbial Arsenic Cycle in a Salt-Saturated, Extreme Environment
Published in
Science, May 2005
DOI 10.1126/science.1110832
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald S. Oremland, Thomas R. Kulp, Jodi Switzer Blum, Shelley E. Hoeft, Shaun Baesman, Laurence G. Miller, John F. Stolz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 6%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 194 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 25%
Researcher 36 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Master 21 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 8%
Other 44 20%
Unknown 24 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 37 17%
Environmental Science 35 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 8%
Chemistry 12 6%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 30 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,142,350
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science
#20,463
of 83,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,473
of 72,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#55
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.