↓ Skip to main content

A critical review of twenty years' use of the resource-ratio theory.

Overview of attention for article published in The American Naturalist, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
563 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A critical review of twenty years' use of the resource-ratio theory.
Published in
The American Naturalist, February 2005
DOI 10.1086/428681
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 563 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 22 4%
France 7 1%
Germany 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 505 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 142 25%
Researcher 126 22%
Student > Master 45 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 40 7%
Student > Bachelor 38 7%
Other 103 18%
Unknown 69 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 298 53%
Environmental Science 128 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 1%
Engineering 4 <1%
Other 20 4%
Unknown 81 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2005.
All research outputs
#24,756,754
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from The American Naturalist
#3,825
of 4,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,568
of 220,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Naturalist
#22
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.