| Title |
'Relief of oppression': An organizing principle for researchers' obligations to participants in observational studies in the developing world
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-384 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James V Lavery, Sunita VS Bandewar, Joshua Kimani, Ross EG Upshur, Frances A Plummer, Peter A Singer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Philosophy | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,535,614
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,034
of 17,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,258
of 103,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#17
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.