↓ Skip to main content

To Clone or Not To Clone: Method Analysis for Retrieving Consensus Sequences In Ancient DNA Samples

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
To Clone or Not To Clone: Method Analysis for Retrieving Consensus Sequences In Ancient DNA Samples
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Poland 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Iceland 1 1%
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 84 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 32%
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 20%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2011.
All research outputs
#4,130,403
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#41,895
of 224,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,943
of 166,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#470
of 2,435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.