↓ Skip to main content

Distinct retrieval and retention mechanisms are required for the quality control of endoplasmic reticulum protein folding

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Distinct retrieval and retention mechanisms are required for the quality control of endoplasmic reticulum protein folding
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, October 2001
DOI 10.1083/jcb.200106123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 22%
Researcher 25 22%
Professor 11 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2003.
All research outputs
#10,782,638
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#7,621
of 13,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,723
of 66,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#31
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.