↓ Skip to main content

A Consensus RNA Signal That Directs Germ Layer Determinants to the Vegetal Cortex of Xenopus Oocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Biology, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Consensus RNA Signal That Directs Germ Layer Determinants to the Vegetal Cortex of Xenopus Oocytes
Published in
Developmental Biology, August 2002
DOI 10.1006/dbio.2002.0719
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

RNA localization is an important mechanism for generating cellular diversity and polarity in the early embryo. In Xenopus, the correct localization of the RNA encoding the T-box transcription factor VegT is essential for the correct spatial organization and identity of endoderm and mesoderm. Although localization signals in the 3' UTR have been identified for many localized RNAs, insight into what constitutes an RNA localization signal remains elusive. To investigate possible common features between signals that direct different RNAs to the same subcellular region, we carried out a detailed analysis of the uncharacterized VegT RNA localization signal and compared it with the well-studied Vg1 localization signal. Both RNAs localize to the vegetal cortex during the same period of oogenesis. Our results suggest a common RNA localization signal at the level of clustered redundant protein-binding motifs and trans-acting factors. We propose that what characterizes RNA localization signals in general is not the nucleotide sequence or secondary structure per se, but the critical clustering of specific redundant protein-binding motifs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 9 25%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 36%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2002.
All research outputs
#19,156,724
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Biology
#4,515
of 5,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,927
of 54,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Biology
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,741 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.